erinptah: Cat in christmas lights (christmas)

I got a shoutout in the “thanks to some of our patrons” section from this episode of Hello From The Magic Tavern! I never listen to the credits, someone else going through the archive pointed it out to me, which is why it’s from July 2023 and I’m only realizing it now. Neat.

(I’m not a regular supporter, I just jump in for a month every so often to download a new batch of episodes. They get so many patrons, I can’t imagine them thanking everyone, but maybe they do? Or maybe I just got lucky with the timing.)

*

After some aggressive weeding of my Youtube recommendations, I finally got it to go back to reccing new videos (a) from channels I’m not already watching (b) that are relevant to my interests! (Fingers crossed that this lasts.)

Mini-vent from watching some new-to-me DID Youtubers: there’s a purported statistic of how 1% of the population actually has DID, and it gets repeated by so many people in the community…

And none of them mention what study it’s from. Pretty sure they’re all quoting each other. I finally found a couple real studies with the number! …They cited it as coming from other studies, which cited it from other studies.

Long story short, I would bet money that every single mention of this stat goes back to this one paper: Sar V, Akyuz G, Dogan O, 2007. Prevalence of dissociative disorders among women in the general population. Psychiatry Res. 149, 169–176. 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.01.005

The title already tells you they were only surveying women. The abstract clarifies that they only surveyed women from one specific city in Turkey. And that “1.1% rate of DID” number…seems to be based on the subjects’ results from “filling out the DDIS one time”? (Anyone with time and access to read the full text — if they were actually diagnosed based on something more, please drop a comment to clarify.)

All of this was published in 2007. And I haven’t found any sign of these results being replicated or verified in any other study in the 14 years since.

I don’t think we can call this one a win, folks.

*

Mentioned this on Mastodon back around Holmesageddon, keep meaning to document it here:

“Thankfully [group] came to its senses and changed back to the old policy” sounds exactly like someone complaining about AO3 wrangling decisions, right?

It’s a quote from a professional in my library’s cataloging department, talking about the professionals at the United States Library of Congress.

It’s true the OTW doesn’t always get advice from experts. And yeah, there are ways in which the org has noticeably suffered for it. But sometimes I see “if only AO3 hired professional librarians to handle the tagging system, they would all agree on how to categorize things and never make bad decisions”…and, no. Not how it works. Sure wish it was. But nope.

erinptah: Cat in christmas lights (christmas)

Shifting books at the library the other day, I found a used condom (not a fresh one, either) stashed behind a shelf of J.D. Salinger, so that’s how my week is going!

(Honestly disappointed. If it had been a few bays earlier it would’ve been with the Ayn Rand, which would make a much better joke.)

(This is all in service of a big shifting/condensing project I’m doing with a bunch of 20th century authors. Books on 21st-century authors have been crammed into just one aisle, it keeps filling up and needing to be pared down — all the while there’s space on the aisles downwind, where nobody feels pressured to weed those, even though we definitely don’t need to still have 3 copies of a Salinger biography from 1992.)

*

Nobly resisting the urge to download + start wasting time with a new stupid phone game.

Not sure if I’ve written about this before — my laundry place has an app, and the app has Sponsor Tie-In Offers, where if you reach (let’s say) levels 20, 50, and 100 of Ball Sort Puzzle, you get 5 cents, 13 cents, and 32 cents of credit in your laundry account. I haven’t added IRL cash to the account since this program started.

All this wouldn’t be worth doing if the games were a chore, but they’re engineered to be tiny little dopamine factories. You get a never-ending succession of Tasks, complicated enough to keep your attention, short enough that you’re getting steady hits to the Task Completed! part of your brain. The whole laundry tie-in is really useful for me, because “there is no more laundry credit to be earned from this game” is a built-in threshold for “okay, time to stop playing and delete the app now.”

So I’m currently between games, and missing those dopamine hits. But I know from experience that “oh, I’ll just play five levels, then go back to focusing on comics for a few hours” is a no-go. Like Odysseus needing to be tied to the mast to keep himself from following the Sirens, I need to not have a game app installed to keep myself from opening it.

You gotta set yourself up for success.

*

Had to bail on Yuletide this year. I gave myself too many end-of-year deadlines to hit, something had to go. (The others are mostly Leif & Thorn stuff — today’s goal is to knock out another round of Volume 7 editing + bonus art.)

At least I did it at the start of the month, instead of denying the problem until the last minute, so my recip won’t be stuck with “a pinch hit that somebody only had a week to write”!

I do have the prompt set open in another tab, in the hopes that I’ll have time/energy to write somebody a quick treat before the collection goes live. It…does not seem likely. But, again, setting up for success, just in case.

Profile

erinptah: (Default)
humorist + humanist

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Page generated May. 18th, 2025 12:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

OSZAR »